НВ (Новое Время)

Court Scandal Surrounding Perplexity: Company Accused of Privacy Violations Alongside Google and Meta

Perplexity, a company specializing in artificial intelligence-based search technologies, finds itself at the center of a significant court scandal that could have serious repercussions for its reputation and business model.

The company Perplexity, which specializes in developing search technologies based on artificial intelligence, has become embroiled in a high-profile court scandal that could have serious consequences for its reputation and business model. A class-action lawsuit filed by an anonymous user claims that Perplexity, along with major tech giants Google and Meta, systematically violates the privacy of millions of individuals who use their services.

According to court documents, it has been revealed that confidential user communications were transmitted to third-party companies for the purpose of increasing advertising revenues. This occurred even in cases where users activated the 'incognito' mode, which they believed would ensure greater privacy. The plaintiff in the case asserts that Perplexity actively encourages individuals to share detailed information, including financial reports, legal issues, and medical data, raising serious concerns about the security of personal information.

It is important to note that through embedded trackers, such as Meta Pixel and Google Ads, the content of chats and personally identifiable information (PII) became accessible to third parties. The lawsuit emphasizes that for users without a subscription, the situation is even more complicated: their dialogues were transmitted via URLs that were fully accessible to advertising systems. Even paying customers were not protected— their email addresses and search histories also ended up in the databases of Google and Meta.

One of the most alarming aspects of this lawsuit is the collection of information regarding users' health statuses. According to the data, the Perplexity system is designed to inquire about users' biopsy results or treatment plans, which are then used for aggressive advertising targeting. Such actions are compared to 'listening technology' that operates covertly from the consumer, raising legitimate concerns about the ethics and legality of such practices.

The plaintiff is seeking a judicial injunction against such practices, as further use of the service under these conditions becomes impossible for those who value the security of their data. Currently, the Perplexity system is under close scrutiny from human rights advocates who are concerned about the potential disregard for privacy laws in favor of corporate profits. This issue resonates widely in society, as data privacy becomes an increasingly relevant topic in the digital age.

Meanwhile, representatives from Perplexity, Google, and Meta have yet to make official statements regarding this lawsuit; however, experts believe that this case could set a precedent for other companies operating in the technology and advertising sectors. In an era of growing attention to consumer data protection, it is crucial for tech companies to adhere to ethical standards and legislation to avoid similar scandals in the future.