НВ (Новое Время)

Negotiations Between the U.S. and Iran Fail Due to Unacceptable Demands from Tehran — WSJ

Efforts by mediators to advance negotiations between the United States and Iran regarding a ceasefire have so far been unsuccessful, as Tehran rejected a planned meeting with American representatives in Islamabad, calling Washington's demands unacceptable.

Attempts by intermediaries to move forward with negotiations between the United States of America and Iran regarding a ceasefire have not yielded results. Tehran declined a scheduled meeting with American representatives in Islamabad, labeling the demands put forth by Washington as unacceptable. This information was reported by the reputable publication The Wall Street Journal.

Efforts by Pakistan and other regional states aimed at organizing negotiations between the U.S. and Iran have effectively reached a deadlock. According to The Wall Street Journal, the Iranian side informed mediators that it is not prepared to meet with American officials in the Pakistani capital in the coming days. Tehran also emphasized that the conditions proposed by the U.S. are considered completely unacceptable.

Despite this situation, diplomatic efforts have not ceased. According to WSJ, Turkey and Egypt are actively seeking new venues for potential contacts, considering locations such as Istanbul and Doha. Mediators are also working on new formulas that could help both sides emerge from the current impasse.

The backdrop for the failure of yet another round of negotiations has been the mutually exclusive statements from both parties. Previously, Donald Trump claimed that Iran had supposedly requested a ceasefire; however, this was publicly denied in Tehran. Simultaneously, the news agency Reuters reported, citing Iranian sources, that Tehran rejected a 48-hour ceasefire proposal from the U.S.

According to WSJ, during unofficial contacts, Iran articulated tough conditions for ending the war: payment of reparations, withdrawal of American troops from bases in the Middle East, and guarantees that there would be no further strikes. Sources for the publication also noted that Trump showed a willingness to discuss a ceasefire only on the condition that the Strait of Hormuz is opened. Earlier, CNN reported that a new demand from Iran for ending the war had emerged, which had not been present before—recognition of Iran's sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.

On March 31, The Wall Street Journal reported that U.S. President Donald Trump is willing to conclude the war against Iran even if the Strait of Hormuz is not fully opened. On March 28, Reuters reported that a month after the start of military operations against Iran, Trump faced a difficult choice—either strike a potentially imperfect deal and end the war or risk escalation that could lead to a protracted conflict.

This situation surrounding the negotiations between the U.S. and Iran highlights the complexity of diplomatic efforts in a region where tensions between states remain high. The lack of progress in negotiations could lead to further escalation of the conflict, raising concerns not only in Middle Eastern countries but also globally.