Kyiv Post
Why Putin Wants a May 9 Ceasefire in Ukraine
Kyiv questioned why Moscow would wait until May 8 to stop fighting, saying Russia should agree to an immediate 30-day ceasefire rather than one “for a parade.” Make us preferred on Google
Kyiv questioned why Moscow would wait until May 8 to stop fighting, saying Russia should agree to an immediate 30-day ceasefire rather than one “for a parade.”
Make us preferred on Google
Share
Facebook
X (Twitter)
LinkedIn
Bluesky
Email
Copy
Copied
In this pool photograph distributed by the Russian state agency Sputnik, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin leaves Red Square after the Victory Day military parade in central Moscow on May 9, 2025. (Photo by Gavriil Grigorov / POOL / AFP)
Content
Share
Facebook
X (Twitter)
LinkedIn
Bluesky
Email
Copy
Copied
Flip
Make us preferred on Google
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s proposal for a ceasefire in Ukraine during Russia’s May 9 Victory Day celebrations came during a 90-minute phone call with US President Donald Trump on Wednesday.
According to Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov, Putin initiated the call. Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office later, Trump noted that the two leaders had not spoken for some time and asked: “Did he [Putin] already announce it?”
Follow our coverage of the war on the @Kyivpost_official .
Ukraine’s response was immediate.
“Why not now? Why wait until May 8?” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha wrote on social media platform X.
“If Russia truly wants peace, it must cease fire immediately. Ukraine is ready to support a full ceasefire and calls on Russia to declare it immediately for 30 days, rather than just ‘for a parade.’”
A Victory Day Without Military Power
One of the clearest signs of Russia’s changing battlefield realities is expected to be visible in Red Square itself.
For the first time since 2008, Russia’s annual Victory Day parade will proceed without heavy military equipment such as tanks, missile launchers, or artillery systems. Officially, the Russian Defense Ministry cited the “current operational situation,” but analysts say the absence reflects both equipment shortages and security fears.
After more than four years of high-intensity combat in Ukraine, Russia has suffered substantial losses in armored vehicles and artillery systems.
Other Topics of Interest
Kremlin: Putin Wants Victory Day Truce
Vladimir Putin discussed a possible Victory Day truce with Donald Trump, despite past Russian ceasefire pledges that Ukraine says were repeatedly violated.
At the same time, Moscow remains vulnerable to long-range Ukrainian drone attacks. A temporary ceasefire could reduce the likelihood of strikes targeting the capital during one of the Kremlin’s most symbolically important national events.
Putin’s ceasefire proposal was also carefully timed politically.
By raising the idea directly with Trump, the Kremlin appears eager to position Russia as open to negotiations while placing diplomatic pressure on Kyiv.
If Kyiv rejects a short-term truce, the Kremlin could attempt to portray Ukraine as unwilling to pursue peace, particularly to audiences outside Europe.
Military Exhaustion on the Front
Russian forces continue to suffer from severe attrition. Western intelligence estimates suggest Russian casualties have surpassed 1.2 million.
A temporary pause in fighting would provide overstretched Russian units with time to rotate troops, move ammunition, repair equipment, and strengthen defensive positions after months of grinding combat.
For military planners, even a brief operational pause could carry significant value.
Symbolism and Domestic Politics
Victory Day remains the most politically important holiday in modern Russia and occupies a central role in Putin’s wartime messaging.
Since the full-scale invasion began, the Kremlin has increasingly tied the war in Ukraine to the Soviet Union’s victory over Nazi Germany during World War II, presenting the conflict as part of a broader historical struggle against “Nazism.”
But with no major battlefield breakthrough to showcase this year, the Kremlin can instead present Putin as a global leader negotiating directly with Washington.
The contrast between last year’s aggressive Victory Day promotion and this year’s defensive scaling back highlights how dramatically Russia’s position has changed.
In 2025, Russian state media heavily promoted the attendance of 29 foreign leaders, with high-profile guests such as Chinese President Xi Jinping and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva announced weeks in advance to demonstrate that Western efforts to isolate Moscow had failed.
This year, however, the atmosphere surrounding May 9 is markedly different.
As of April 30, the Kremlin still has not officially announced foreign guests expected to attend the parade.
Moscow’s current call for a temporary May 9 ceasefire is notably different from its response to a similar proposal from President Volodymyr Zelensky just weeks earlier.
In late March 2026, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov dismissed Zelensky’s proposal for an Easter ceasefire, arguing that Moscow was interested in “peace, not a ceasefire.”
Peskov claimed the Kremlin had not seen a “clearly formulated initiative” for an Easter truce, despite Kyiv publicly presenting the proposal and discussing it through US mediators.
Earlier this month, Putin’s 32-hour Orthodox Easter truce was violated thousands of times, leaving observers with little confidence in Russia’s ceasefire proposals.
Sevinj Osmanqizi is a journalist covering US foreign policy, security, and geopolitics, with a focus on the broader post-Soviet space. She reports on Washington’s decision-making and its implications for Ukraine and regional stability.