Інтерфакс-Україна

High Anti-Corruption Court Confiscates Two Toyota Crossovers from Former Head of Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi Military Recruitment Center

The High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine has made a significant ruling concerning the former head of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support in the Odesa region, confiscating two luxury Toyota vehicles due to unjustified asset claims.

The High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine (VAKS) has delivered a pivotal verdict regarding the former head of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support (TCK and SP) in the Odesa region. The court has ruled that the assets utilized by the family of this official are unjustified and has ordered their confiscation for the benefit of the state. Specifically, the assets in question include two Toyota vehicles: a 2022 Toyota C-HR HYBRID and a 2021 Toyota C-HR.

This information was confirmed by the press service of VAKS, which noted that the decision was made on April 3. The panel of judges granted the civil lawsuit filed by the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAP) against the former head of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi TCK and his family. The court found that the assets used by these individuals lacked justification, which served as the basis for their confiscation.

The court's announcement detailed that two vehicles belonging to the former head of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi TCK were seized for state revenue. The 2022 Toyota C-HR HYBRID is valued at 1,381,630 hryvnias, while the 2021 Toyota C-HR is assessed at 564,789 hryvnias. Consequently, the total value of the confiscated vehicles exceeds 1.9 million hryvnias.

The VAKS ruling can be appealed to the Appellate Chamber of the High Anti-Corruption Court within thirty days from the date of its announcement. This means that the former head of the TCK and his family have the opportunity to contest this decision if they believe it to be unjust.

It is noteworthy that earlier, the State Bureau of Investigations (DBR) also reported suspicions against one of the employees of the Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi TCK and SP. This individual was suspected of accepting money to assist conscripted men in evading mobilization. This case underscores the importance of combating corruption in Ukraine, particularly in the areas of military registration and mobilization.

Thus, the VAKS decision regarding the confiscation of vehicles is part of a broader anti-corruption campaign ongoing in Ukraine, demonstrating that state authorities are prepared to act decisively in cases involving abuse of office and corrupt practices.